Facial subcutaneous emphysema due to rectum injury after pelvic fracture

  1. Joost H Kuipers ,
  2. P Koen Bos and
  3. Duncan E Meuffels
  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Joost H Kuipers; joostk@gmail.com

Publication history

Accepted:10 Jun 2021
First published:01 Jul 2021
Online issue publication:01 Jul 2021

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

A 35-year old dockworker sustained a pelvic injury when he was caught by a large loading clamshell grab. Primary survey revealed an open book pelvic fracture with soft tissue defects of the left thigh and groin. CT scanning of the thorax and abdomen did not reveal significant additional injuries. Partly due to patient’s haemodynamical instability, osteosynthesis of the pelvic fracture was performed immediately after resuscitation, whereby the severely contaminated wound of the thigh was debrided and irrigated. The following days, progressive facial subcutaneous emphysema developed, but patient remained clinically stable. Several specialists were consulted, but did not find a cause. At day 7, a second surgery was planned to treat a pelvic surgical wound infection. Unexpectedly, we found faecal contamination in the pelvic surgical wound. The consulted gastro/intestinal-surgeon performed a laparoscopic colostomy for a rectal laceration. Awareness for bowel injuries with open pelvic fracture should be high, also when subcutaneous emphysema is found remotely.

Background

Pelvic fractures account for 3% of all skeletal injuries, of which 2%–4% are open pelvic fractures.1 In children, the incidence of open pelvic fractures is 12.9%.2 An open pelvic fracture exists when there is direct communication between the fracture and a skin, vaginal or rectal wound. Open pelvic fractures are associated with a high morbidity and high mortality (up to 80%).1–3 It is a rare condition, so one has to be aware of it to recognise it. There are only few case reports about open pelvic fractures and urethral, vaginal or rectal injuries.4–6 Cases with progressive subcutaneous emphysema following pelvic fractures have not been published before.7 This case shows that it is important to consider rectal injuries when a patient presents with subcutaneous crepitus due to subcutaneous emphysema. Despite all additional studies and different specialists involved, there was still a significant delay in diagnosis. Here, we describe the features of rectal injury in a patient with an open pelvic fracture, to give better direction and hopefully shorten the time to diagnosis and treatment in future cases.

Case presentation

A 35-year-old healthy male dockworker with no prior medical history was brought to the trauma room of the Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam by the mobile medical team.8 He was found in the harbour in a loading site for corn underneath a large clamshell grab. Patient was analysed according to the advanced trauma life support (ATLS) protocol.9 He was haemodynamically unstable, but had a maximum Glasgow Coma Score. Main injury was a large inguinal laceration, which ran to the medial side of the upper left leg.

Investigations

Laboratory testing showed a haemoglobin level of 129 g/L and lactate of 2.7 mmol/L, chest X-ray revealed no signs of pneumothorax and X-ray of the pelvis revealed an open book fracture with corn contamination (figure 1A). In addition, extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma was negative, CT of the cerebrum/cervical spine/thorax–abdomen showed no traumatic lesions or signs of arterial, intestinal, urethral or bladder injuries. Skeletal CT scan showed a medial tibial plateau fracture on the left side and more than 6-cm diastasis of the symphysis pubis with ipsilateral widening of the sacroiliac joint making it a grade 3 anterior posterior compression pelvic injury (APC-3 according to the Young-Burgess classification).10 Urethral injury was ruled out by a retrograde urethrogram.

Figure 1

(A) Pelvic trauma X-ray with corn contamination. (B) Postoperative X-ray of pelvis with osteosynthesis of pubic bone.

The patient was taken to the operating room for stabilisation by pelvic closure, fixation and wound debridement. Following inspection, debridement and irrigation, the plastic surgeon treated the soft tissue injury, while the orthopaedic surgeon performed an open reduction and plate fixation of the symphysis pubis with a plate screw osteosynthesis through a separate (clean) horizontal incision over the pubic bone (‘Pfannenstiel’) (figure 1B).

On the second postoperative day, patient experienced a snapping sensation followed by a swelling on his right jaw, during mobilising. His vital signs were normal and stable. A chest X-ray showed massive subcutaneous emphysema with no signs of pneumothorax (figure 2A). The consulted surgeon suspected an injury of the thoracic cavity, due to the compression injury and advised to rule out locoregional causes. The consulted pulmonologist performed a CT scan of the chest (figure 2B) and a bronchoscopy, during which subcutaneous emphysema was seen in the vocal cords, without an explanation for the air leakage. In the following days, the subcutaneous emphysema expanded further to his face. A new CT scan of thorax and abdomen confirmed an increase of subcutaneous emphysema, without an apparent cause. Because a gastroenteric origin of air leakage was now more likely, the gastroenterologist ruled out an oesophageal lesion on a CT of the thorax and abdomen with oral contrast. Subsequently, the ear, nose and throat specialist examined and excluded the upper airways as a cause for the subcutaneous emphysema. While we still had no explanation for the facial emphysema, our patient developed surgical wound leakage and signs of infection. The patient was clinically stable, but his C reactive protein remained high (344 mg/L) despite adequate drainage of the large wound bed and prolonged antibiotic treatment. A wound debridement was scheduled on day 8.

Figure 2

(A) Chest X-ray with subcutaneous emphysema without signs of an pneumothorax. (B) CT scan of thorax with no sign of pneumothorax.

Treatment

Prior to surgery, faecal contamination was observed in his surgical pubic wound. Therefore, the orthopaedic surgeon performed the second surgery together with a gastrointestinal (GI) surgeon. The surgical transverse pubic incision was opened; inflamed tissue and pus were seen under the pubic bone and tissue cultures were taken. No severe contamination was seen in the lower pelvic and groin area. The GI surgeon performed a digital rectal examination and felt a big ventral rectal laceration, 2 cm proximal from the anus. It was possible to digitally enter the surgical wound from the rectal laceration. Death tissue was excised and extensive lavage with 3 L of NaCl was performed, after which two drains were left and the wound was closed. Subsequently, the GI surgeon performed a laparoscopic double loop colostomy. After surgery, patient received intravenous antibiotics for a total of 2 weeks for an Escherichia coli, followed by 4-week oral antibiotics according to the guidelines for fracture-related infections (FRI).11

Outcome and follow-up

During the postoperative days, the subcutaneous emphysema, inflammation parameters and wound drain production steadily decreased. His colostomy had normal output. Four weeks after trauma, he was transferred to a rehabilitation centre. Patient was frequently seen at the orthopaedic outpatient clinic, while he was still rehabilitating with his physiotherapist.

After half a year, he was able to ambulate by himself the whole day. The X-ray of his pelvis showed a stable osteosynthesis. Patient visited the GI surgeon to reverse his colostomy after 11 months. At the outpatient clinic, we observed a skin fistula, which produced small amounts of pus. After 15 months, the plate and screws were removed from his pubic bone and sent for culturing. Postoperatively, he was treated for osteomyelitis of the pubic bone according to the FRI protocol. Afterwards, the wound healed well, inflammation parameters improved and follow-up visits were discontinued.

Discussion

Extensive subcutaneous emphysema is a phenomenon that is often seen in thoracic trauma on the thorax, on the neck and sometimes on the face, but can also be seen in serious bowel injury. Combined injuries of pelvic fractures and intrapelvic organs are described in several case series and reports.2 4–6 12 Most intrapelvic organs, as well as the rectum, are located extraperitoneal. Injuries in this area are clinically hard to diagnose, due to the absence of peritonitis. Injuries of the rectum can also be difficult to diagnose on CT scans. We describe a case with a significant delay in diagnosis of rectal injury, despite thorough ATLS evaluation and consultations. The most recent ATLS manual edition advises that urethral, perineal, rectal, vaginal and gluteal examination should only be performed when there is a high suspicion of any of these injuries. In this case, urethral injury was ruled out, but no rectal examination was performed because of a low suspicion of rectal injury.

One large cohort study evaluated the probability of intrapelvic injuries in different types of pelvic factures, using the Young-Burgess classification.10 Two per cent of all pelvic fractures have a rectal injury.13 The APC fractures have the highest likelihood of rectal injury; 75% of the patients with a rectal injury had an APC fracture.13 This can be explained because the rectum is attached to the pelvic wall with lateral ligaments. When a symphysiolysis of the pubic bone occurs due to an APC injury, the lateral rectal ligament may tear a hole in the rectal wall.

This case demonstrates that thorough clinical examination, including digital inspection of the rectal cavity, should be performed in patients with multi-trauma with unexplainable subcutaneous emphysema, especially in patients with a pelvic APC injury. One should assess and reassess the patient regularly, because the situation can change over time. When there is a high suspicion of rectal injury and digital examination is not conclusive, direct visualisation of the rectum is recommended.3

Learning points

  • When the usual suspects of subcutaneous emphysema have been ruled out, be aware of other reasons for this symptom, such as bowel injury.

  • During secondary survey, digital rectal examination has to be performed to rule out rectal injury, especially in anterior posterior compression injuries, to prevent development of subcutaneous emphysema and faecal contamination.

  • Ask a specialist to perform a ‘rectoscopic’ examination if you question your findings during clinical examination or have a high suspicion of rectal injury.

Ethics statements

Footnotes

  • Contributors JK, KB and DEM were involved in conceptualisation, writing and critically revising the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer